« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

June 30, 2007

Twitter not Just for Twits; A Discussion of Twitter in Education

filed under: Web 2.0
tags:

I was reading Christopher Sessums' blog this morning and came across Twitter Me This: Brainstorming Potential Educational Uses for Twitter. As we have posted a few times on Twitter, I thought it would link to his post as it provides a window into what others view as the potential of Twitter.

Is the true strength of Twitter that it provides a "technocool" media to conscisely exchange the thoughts that pass through one's mind as they work on a project or tackle the day to day activities of life?

June 28, 2007

iPhone lives...

filed under: Gadgets
tags:

...or dies?

Well the iPhone comes out in about 2 hours, and I apologize for Susan's comments not being posted earlier, I have to admit I ignored the email(I was on the beach). I hate to say it, but I actually hope this thing does well, if for no other reason than it will drive others to see what they can incorporate to their devices. I wouldn't own one yet for a few reasons...

1. Nothing but a touch screen(although I heard it was glass, not plastic), I can't see myself not beating the snot out of a touch screen. Also, in the commercial I saw, the disconnect button on the screen is right where my jaw would hit it while carrying on a conversation, although I'm not saying this is a deal breaker.

2. Limited availability. Cingular(AT&T) will have all the techno-nuts running for one, but the nearest AT&T retailer is in New Castle. I have a buddy who has one of their phones, it's not worth anything up here if you want to actually use it. I assume this will change quickly as subscribers from the other big guns (Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint) demand it. Or is there a 2 year exclusivity agreement like with the Razr?

3. This is the big one. $600!(rumored) Are you kidding me! It should answer email for me at that price. Even assuming a $200 credit for signing up, that's $400 more than my Q. I realize that when BlackBerry first came up with the idea their phones were that much, but that was 5 years ago. For me, you'd better invent some new technology to suggest that price, and I don't think Apple has done that.

All that being said, I'd guess we'll see at least one on campus this fall that doesn't belong to Susan, and when you get yours-bring it down the hall-I want to see what it can do!

June 15, 2007

Is The Future 3D?

filed under: Software Trends
tags:

James recently wrote about 3D Web-Browsing With SpaceTime. Watching the demos on the SpaceTime site reminded me a lot of the Cover Flow features being added to Leopard, Apple's soon-to-be-released version of OS X.

If you have ITunes 7 you can see Cover Flow now - just click View > Cover Flow view - or you can watch a demo of Cover Flow in Leopard here.

My question is this: Is all this really a good thing? Will it help me find things quicker or is it just pretty?

I find Cover Flow in iTunes fun to play around with, but not great for finding songs. The (text) search in ITunes is very good and very quick and I can find what I want so much quicker that way. Plus, having used iTunes the last several years, leaving my old albums and CDs to collect dust, I no longer know what the cover art for an album looks like. As I watch the pretty covers - most of which I've never seen before - fly by in Cover Flow I'm amazed that they belong to songs and albums I own. So Cover Flow is not much use for me - right now - when it comes to finding songs in iTunes.

But I can see how it might be helpful in the Finder. When I'm searching through a folder I usually have a better idea of what the document, photo or movie I want looks like than I do of what I named it. So seeing the document in Cover Flow view really might work to speed things along.

I'm looking forward to putting this to the test when Leopard is released. At least I'll be prepared with a computer with plenty of graphics power!

June 4, 2007

I'm not Dead, and maybe spelling isn't either

filed under: Gadgets
tags:

Ok, I haven't fallen off of the earth, just been too busy to post, and haven't had anything exciting to say anyhow. Today a thought finally popped into my head though, so we'll run with it and see where it goes.

Those that know me well know I'm a gadget head, I had XM the day it was available, a PDA before most people could spell it, pagers, cell phones, internet, then broadband. I've been at the beginning of all of it. That being said, I've been avoiding a smart phone for several reasons. First, I'm not sure I want to be that connected, my email will be there when I get to it. Second, it won't yet replace my laptop, it's not like you're going to type a dissertation on a keyboard half the size of your palm. Lastly, and probably the biggest, was the one thing I refused to drink the Kool-Aid on, text messaging, it drives me nuts. A friend sent me a text message on my cell phone one day and after figuring out how to read it, the message was "wher r u?", I had to call and ask her what she wanted, because that wasn't any language I spoke. I had someone tell me the other day they loved the cell phone commercial with the girl and her mother arguing, the girl speaking in all txt (that's text for those not ITK or in the know) shorthand. The first time I saw it I had to fight the urge not to throw the remote through the screen. When I was in high school the complaint was that without spell check most kids couldn't type or write a sentence. That's the way I feel about text messaging and that dumb commercial, how long will it be before kids are saying things like "AFAIK my frend Jim was ROFL.", and no one finds it odd. In reality I think that would be too long for a text message, and probably doesn't have enough shorthand. I could just see a billion people with smart phones and all of a sudden email, which, as odd as it may sound, I actually use to get things done and stay in touch, would turn into "wher r u?". So yesterday I head up to my cell phone provider's store to upgrade my phone as my new every two has kicked in. After deciding on my new phone I was still about 10th in line so I wander over to the smart phone section. Well, I think, it does sort of have a keyboard, I could combine my PDA and phone into one, and update appointments, contacts, and tasks(my to-do list) on the fly with my PC at work, even if I'm sitting on a stream in Montana. I'd still need my laptop to get real work done, but could easily answer email on this pint sized keyboard from anywhere I might care to read it. So I got one, heck I've got 30 days to take it back if I don't like it. I think I'm already sold. I ended up with Motorola's Q for several reasons. One, it runs Windows Mobile, which means Outlook, which is what I use to pretty much run my working life. Two, it fits in my pocket, I refuse to wear a phone on my belt, it's like a pocket protector for the new millenium(although a thumb drive around the neck really looks good!), also, the new Palm 700 has a touch screen which after going in and out of my pocket a few times and getting scratched would have been worthless. The Motorola is also rubber coated, which should help keep it from getting beat up by all the other crap I tend to carry in my pockets. Now that I have it I'm surprised, it's not nearly as intrusive as I thought. I can schedule how often and between what times I'd like it to check my email(every 20 min. from 8am-10pm). I can ignore it if so inclined. If there is an emergency I can deal with it. Just tonight driving home from Erie I rescheduled an appointment, called the person, rearranged the time, entered the new appointment on my phone, and when I get to work tomorrow it will be updated on my calendar. Most importantly smart phone's may save conversation as we know it, simply because it doesn't take any longer to type "where are you?" (13 keystrokes on a smart phone without the question mark) versus "wher r u?" (15 on a regular phone, 26 if you spell it correctly, yep, I counted). I still don't yet see the day where you're "typing" a document on one, but mine already does voice recognition for various functions like looking up a contact, calling someone, or opening a program. I'm thinking that the next time my new every two shows up that my new one may be able to do voice recognition for document writing. That to me is where they will start to replace laptops. Now I'm off to find a spell checker for mine since I can't type a sentance.

Where Do I Get My Glasses? 3D Web-Browsing With SpaceTime

filed under: Software
tags:

Learned about SpaceTime™ via a recent post on Technology Review.

As it is hard to judge value of a new technology from the outside, I downloaded it to see just what 3D browsing is. I wonder if this is anything more than eye-candy for your browser. SpaceTime representatives say 3D browsing will provide utility on top of the eye-candy...

"SpaceTime is part of a trend to take advantage of the massive amount of memory that's available in today's standard computers. Software designers are able to build graphical bells and whistles into applications, thanks to the steady increase in computing power with each successive generation of processor. For the most part, says Bakhash, high-powered graphics chips are used to "beautify what you see, to make a video game more realistic, or add more lighting effects." With SpaceTime, he says, "we take that power and give the user more utility."..."

We will see...

June 1, 2007

Silly Name Silly Application or Twitter Is There A Point?

filed under: Web 2.0
tags:

Jason posted a while back on techNOcool: Ever growing connectedness and Susan, Jason and I commented on it.

And last week I went to actually try it out. (Even though I still have not gotten by the why would I want to yet.) I am on as jfadden. Perhaps as with blogs a purpose will emerge with use. Or I will realize how boring I am or how silly I look staring at my belly-button.